Search for: All records

While biopolymers have the potential to enhance agrochemical delivery and mitigate environmental impacts such as runoff, previous plant studies have often been limited to examining single biopolymers in isolation. This approach has hindered effective comparisons of plant outcomes due to variations in plant type, growth duration, and soil characteristics. The current study addresses this gap by incorporating six separate milled biopolymers: pectin, starch, chitosan, polycaprolactone (PCL), polylactic acid (PLA), or polyhydroxybutyrate (PHB) into soil and directly comparing their impacts on tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) plants cultivated under identical environmental parameters. Plant outcomes were also studied when biopolymers were modified via the inclusion of two phosphorus (P) salts, forming two types of Polymer-P-containing salt composites with amorphous CaPO4 (CaP) and CaHPO4 (DCP). Our results revealed that chitosan-based treatments significantly improved tomato root and shoot biomass, with increases of 200–300% compared to the control plants. Chitosan-CaP and Chitosan-DCP also enhanced P uptake, though the effect was significantly more pronounced in the former, suggesting a synergy between chitosan and CaP. Neither Chitosan-P-containing salt treatment, however, mitigated P leaching from soil when compared to CaP or DCP applied in isolation. The two most hydrophilic biopolymers, pectin and starch, as well as their P-salt-containing counterparts, showed the most substantial reductions in biomass (∼80%) with respect to control plants, while similarly lowering P uptake and P retention in soil compared to CaP- and DCP-only plants. PCL- and PHB-based treatments also adversely influenced biomass and plant P, though these effects were not as drastic as those observed with pectin and starch. PLA-based soil amendments had no effect on any plant performance metric, though PLA-CaP, specifically, was the only treatment to appreciably mitigate P leaching (−63%). Based on these findings, subsequent tomato growth experiments were conducted over a longer 8-week period with CaP, DCP, Chitosan, Chitosan-CaP, and Chitosan-DCP. While all chitosan-treated plants showed similar enhancements in biomass, plants treated with Chitosan-CaP and Chitosan-DCP were the only ones to fruit, demonstrating the benefit of using chitosan in conjunction with a P source as compared to either treatment in isolation. These findings contribute to an expanding body of evidence that biopolymer carriers can offer a more sustainable approach to improving the precision of nutrient delivery, while also highlighting the pivotal role of biopolymer and nutrient type in the development of these carriers. 

Although the Green Revolution dramatically increased food production, it led to non- sustainable conventional agricultural practices, with productivity in general declining over the last few decades. Maintaining food security with a world population exceeding 9 billion in 2050, a changing climate, and declining arable land will be exceptionally challenging. In fact, nothing short of a revolution in how we grow, distribute, store, and consume food is needed. In the last ten years, the field of nanotoxicology in plant systems has largely transitioned to one of sustainable nano-enabled applications, with recent discoveries on the use of this advanced technology in agriculture showing tremendous promise. The range of applications is quite extensive, including direct application of nanoscale nutrients for improved plant health, nutrient biofortification, increased photosynthetic output, and greater rates of nitrogen fixation. Other applications include nano-facilitated delivery of both fertilizers and pesticides; nano-enabled delivery of genetic material for gene silencing against viral pathogens and insect pests; and nanoscale sensors to support precision agriculture. Recent efforts have demonstrated that nanoscale strategies increase tolerance to both abiotic and biotic stressors, offering realistic potential to generate climate resilient crops. Considering the efficiency of nanoscale materials, there is a need to make their production more economical, alongside efficient use of incumbent resources such as water and energy. The hallmark of many of these approaches involves much greater impact with far less input of material. However, demonstrations of efficacy at field scale are still insufficient in the literature, and a thorough understanding of mechanisms of action is both necessary and often not evident. Although nanotechnology holds great promise for combating global food insecurity, there are far more ways to do this poorly than safely and effectively. This review summarizes recent work in this space, calling out existing knowledge gaps and suggesting strategies to alleviate those concerns to advance the field of sustainable nano-enabled agriculture. 

Nanoenabled strategies have recently attracted attention as a sustainable platform for agricultural applications. Here, we present a mechanistic understanding of nanobiointeraction through an orthogonal investigation. Pristine (nS) and stearic acid surface-modified (cS) sulfur nanoparticles (NPs) as a multifunctional nanofertilizer were applied to tomato (Solanum lycopersicumL.) through soil. Both nS and cS increased root mass by 73% and 81% and increased shoot weight by 35% and 50%, respectively, compared to the untreated controls. Bulk sulfur (bS) and ionic sulfate (iS) had no such stimulatory effect. Notably, surface modification of S NPs had a positive impact, as cS yielded 38% and 51% greater shoot weight compared to nS at 100 and 200 mg/L, respectively. Moreover, nS and cS significantly improved leaf photosynthesis by promoting the linear electron flow, quantum yield of photosystem II, and relative chlorophyll content. The time-dependent gene expression related to two S bioassimilation and signaling pathways showed a specific role of NP surface physicochemical properties. Additionally, a time-dependent Global Test and machine learning strategy applied to understand the NP surface modification domain metabolomic profiling showed that cS increased the contents of IA, tryptophan, tomatidine, and scopoletin in plant leaves compared to the other treatments. These findings provide critical mechanistic insights into the use of nanoscale sulfur as a multifunctional soil amendment to enhance plant performance as part of nanoenabled agriculture. 

Phosphorus (P) is critical for crop production but has a high nutrient use inefficiency. Tomato was grown in soil amended with five P-sources, used as-is, or embedded within a biodegradable polymer, polyhydroxyalkanoate (PHA). Correlation analysis identified treatments that maintain plant growth, improve bioavailable soil P, and reduce P loss. Three performance classes were identified: (i) micro- and nanohydroxyapatite, which did not increase bioavailable P, plant P-uptake, or change P in runoff/leaching compared to controls; (ii) monocalcium phosphate (MCP), dicalcium phosphate (DCP), calcium pyrophosphate nanoparticles (CAP), and PHA-MCP that increased P-uptake and/or bioavailable P but also increased P loss in runoff/leaching; and (iii) PHA-DCP and PHA-CAP, where increased bioavailable P and plant P-uptake were achieved with minimal P loss in runoff/leaching. In addition to identifying treatments that maintain plant growth, increase bioavailable P, and minimize nutrient loss, correlation plots also revealed that (i) bioavailable P was a good indicator of plant P-uptake; (ii) leached P could be predicted from water solubility; and (iii) P loss through runoff versus leaching showed similar trends. This study highlights that biopolymers can promote plant P-uptake and improve bioavailable soil P, with implications for mitigating the negative environmental impacts of P loss from agricultural systems. 

Limited data exist on how surface charge and morphology impact the effectiveness of nanoscale copper oxide (CuO) as an agricultural amendment under field conditions. This study investigated the impact of these factors on tomatoes and watermelons following foliar treatment with CuO nanosheets (NS-) or nanospikes (NP+ and NP-) exhibiting positive or negative surface charge. Results showed plant species-dependent benefits. Notably, tomatoes infected with Fusarium oxysporum had significantly reduced disease progression when treated with NS-. Watermelons benefited similarly from NP+. Although disease suppression was significant and trends indicated increased yield, the yield effects weren't statistically significant. However, several nanoscale treatments significantly enhanced the fruit's nutritional value, and this nano-enabled biofortification was a function of particle charge and morphology. Negatively charged nanospikes significantly increased the Fe content of healthy watermelon and tomato (20–28 %) and Ca in healthy tomato (66 %), compared to their positively charged counterpart. Negatively charged nanospikes also outperformed negatively charged nanosheets, leading to significant increases in the content of S and Mg in infected watermelon (37–38 %), Fe in healthy watermelon (58 %), and Ca (42 %) in healthy tomato. These findings highlight the potential of tuning nanoscale CuO chemistry for disease suppression and enhanced food quality under field conditions. 

The addition of biochars and nanoparticles with adsorbed Azotobacter vinelandii and Bacillus megaterium alleviated damage from Fusarium infection in both tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) and watermelon (Citrullus lanatus) plants. Tomato and watermelon plants were grown in greenhouse for 28 and 30 days (respectively) and were treated with either nanoparticles (chitosan-coated mesoporous silica or nanoclay) or varying biochars (biochar produced by pyrolysis, gasification and pyrogasification). Treatments with nanoparticles and biochars were applied in two variants – with or without adsorbed plant-growth promoting bacteria (PGPR). Chitosan-coated mesoporous silica nanoparticles with adsorbed bacteria increased chlorophyll content in infected tomato and watermelon plants (1.12 times and 1.63 times, respectively) to a greater extent than nanoclay with adsorbed bacteria (1.10 times and 1.38 times, respectively). However, the impact on other endpoints (viability of plant cells, phosphorus and nitrogen content, as well antioxidative status) was species-specific. In all cases, plants treated with adsorbed bacteria responded better than plants without bacteria. For example, the content of antioxidative compounds in diseased watermelon plants increased nearly 46% upon addition of Aries biochar and by approximately 52% upon addition of Aries biochar with adsorbed bacteria. The overall effect on disease suppression was due to combination of the antifungal effects of both nanoparticles (and biochars) and plant-growth promoting bacteria. These findings suggest that nanoparticles or biochars with adsorbed PGPR could be viewed as a novel and sustainable solution for management of Fusarium wilt. 

Phosphorus (P) loss from agro-ecosystems impinges upon P use efficiency by plants and thereby constitutes both agronomic and environmental nuisances. Herein, we report on the potential for controlling P leaching loss and application in crop fertilization through repurposing and nano-functionalizing tripolyphosphate (TPP) as a sole P source. The developed TPP-Chitosan and TPP-Chitosan-ZnO nanofertilizers exhibited positive surface charges, 5.8 and 13.8 mV, and hydrodynamic sizes of 430 and 301 nm, respectively. In soil, nanoformulations of TPP-Chitosan and TPP-Chitosan-ZnO significantly reduced cumulative P leaching during 72 h, reaching 91 and 97% reductions, respectively, compared to a conventional fertilizer, monoammonium phosphate (MAP). Cumulative P leaching after 72 h from these nanofertilizers was, respectively, 84 and 95% lower than from TPP alone. TPP-Chitosan-ZnO was, overall, 65% more effective in reducing P leaching, compared to TPP-Chitosan. Relative to MAP, the wheat plant height was significantly increased by TPP-Chitosan-ZnO by 33.0%. Compared to MAP, TPP-Chitosan and TPP-Chitosan-ZnO slightly increased wheat grain yield by 21 and 30%, respectively. Notably, TPP-Chitosan-ZnO significantly decreased shoot P levels, by 35.5, 47, and 45%, compared to MAP, TPP, and TPP-Chitosan, respectively. Zn release over 72 h from TPP-Chitosan-ZnO was considerably lower, compared to a control, ZnO nanoparticles, and averaged, respectively, 34.7 and 0.065 mg/L, which was 534 times higher for the former. Grain Zn was significantly higher in the TPP-Chitosan treatment, relative to MAP. TPP-Chitosan also significantly mobilized the resident K, S, Mg, and Ca from soil into the plant, helping to improve the overall nutritional quality and supporting the role of chitosan in nutrient mobilization. Taken together, our data highlight the potential for repurposing a non-fertilizer P material, TPP, for agricultural and environmental applications and the effect of applying nanotechnology on such outcomes. Broadly speaking, the reduction in P loss is critical for controlling the eutrophication of water bodies due to nutrient overload and for sustaining the dwindling global P resources.